AdMast.jpg (35216 bytes)
 

 

Gossage.JPG (5435 bytes)

A book that combines the famous essay 'Is There Any Hope For Advertising?' plus additional material edited by Kim Rotzoll, Jarlath Graham, and Burrows Mussey.

 

NEXT

HEY, WHIPPLE
SQUEEZE THIS!

HOME
BOOK REVIEWS
RESOURCES
ARCHIVES
E-MAIL

 

 

THE TROUBLE WITH ADVERTISING

Considering the heavyweights (Jeff Goodby, Stan Freburg, Jay Conrad) who put it together in 1986, The Book Of Gossage couldn't be anything less than a landmark.

Living in a totally different era, it is difficult to decide whether Howard Luck Gossage, called the 'Socrates of San Francisco', was advertising's enfant terrible or it's greatest defender. Indeed he said some earth-shattering things, that would make Ogilvy's Confessions of An Ad Man, looks like a children's fable. He called Copywriters "very strange people who have only reached copywriting after eliminating every other means of making a living through writing". He is observations were so well put that it made the industry take a good look at what business it was really in.

There is too much of advertising, he complains. "If you have something pertinent to say, you neither have to say it to very many people --only to those who you think will be interested--nor do you have to say it very often. How many times do you have to be told that your house is on fire?" Gossage compares advertising to, God forbid, fertilizer!. It's a disturbing metaphor. There is only so much fertilizer one ought to use, he observes, but people tend to lay it on so think, that it begins to obliterate the crop it was supposed to nurture. At which point it starts to attract flies, the neighbours complain and the stench is unbearable! The whole point of all this is attack the commission-based business model, and move to a fee-based model. That way, he observes, ad campaigns will be based not on how much the client can spend, but on the problem that needs to be solved.

As an insider, Howard Gossage has to be taken seriously. He did write long copy, especially the one (immortalized in Ogilvy On Advertising) headlined: "SHOULD WE ALSO FLOOD THE SISTINE CHAPEL SO THAT TOURISTS CAN GET NEARER THE CEILING?" for the Sierra Club.

In his article, "Advertising and the Facts of Life", he puts describes the 'ethical hypocisy' of Speculative Presentations as an euphemism for stealing. Gossage advocates ads that are responsible, yet those that stick their neck out. Some other uncanny observations:

"Our first duty is not to the old sales curve, it is to the audience."

"I like outdoor advertising. I just think it has no right to be outdoors."

"Nobody reads ads. People read what interests them, and sometimes it's an ad."

"Is advertising worth saving? From an economic point of view I don't think that most of it is. From an aesthetic point of view, I'm damn sure it's not."

SHOCK ADVERTISING IS HERE! But what's so shocking about any of this?
THE FUTURE OF ADVERTISING: A State of the Industry Report: Cover Story, 2000.
AD AGENCIES FLEX  MUSCLE A State of the Industry Report: Cover Story, 1999.
SO IMAGE ISN'T EVERYTHING? Upside down thinking from ad agencies

Copyright: Angelo Fernando