AdMast.jpg (37982 bytes)

 

INDUSTRY VOICES

 

LOOKING FORWARD

LOOKING BACK

(A short history of Advertising)

ADVERTISING BEYOND Y2K   Continued

 

THE TRAINING QUESTION
Besides the awards, the more important areas demanding attention are training and the need to establish a code of fair practice between agencies, marketers, and the media. Every agency claims that the former is advertising’ biggest bugbear.

However, not every agency can put its money where its mouth is when it comes to training. The everyday business of business appears to zap the energy to serve the long-term needs of ad people some of who get by, by being incredibly efficient but not exactly effective. There are the Account Executives who are too scared to contribute to the creative process ("the leave-it-to-the-Creatives" attitude), the Creatives who can’t stand marketing strategy exercise (the "dumb client meeting" approach). The tendency to send off creative people to creative workshops, and media people to media seminars is an easy way out, but it serves little to cross-fertilize the marketing process with different strains of strategy, and big ideas. Can the 4A’s or SLIM fill this need by setting up a training college for its membership? Lilamani Dias-Benson, the 4A’s board member in charge of training, who is also a big advocate of training, has big plans for the 4A’s to have an advertising institute. There are no shortage of disciplines to cover, and probably no shortage of trainers.

On the agency side, Q&E, the largest independent ad agency (which also means it has no multinational agency links), has given a lot of thought to the long term consequences of a shrinking talent pool. This year it will open its advertising academy that will produce advertising ‘graduates’, using resource people form Europe. The first batch of 12 student will follow a rigid programme comprising ten modules. Interestingly this is not being run as a profit center, but as a way of creating a talent pool that many have scoffed at in the past. Until now, the big reluctance has been to invest in training because of the high turnover in agencies. Q&E looks at it differently. Training is Kannangara’s top priority --alongside building a creative reputation. The grad program will put trainees through the basics such as introduction to Marketing, Media Planning and Media Buying. But with an aim to make its people multi-disciplined, the trainees will also be exposed to Art Direction, Copywriting and Web Design. Likewise the Lintas group taps into the ‘Lintas college’ system, a full-time institute that the Colombo office, and all its offices worldwide can make use of. JWT, the self-styled ‘University of advertising’ did not reply to training questions posed to them at the time of writing. (Note: LMD now learns that JWT invested the entire prize money of Rs. 200,000 won at the 1999 SLIM awards, in a training program for sixty of the staff members). All agency heads agree that nurturing one’s human resource is a pre-requisite for nurturing the brands they are entrusted with. But this is the case of the squeaky wheel not getting the grease. As Ms. Dias-Benson ruefully observes, "agencies in Sri Lanka will have to make better margins to be able to afford (such) facilities."

SLIM is big on training. The institute wants to broad-base marketing education and its Business School has franchised the Diploma in Marketing to the central Province Chamber of Commerce. But ad people think there are enough resources within their ranks to have their own programmes. The 4A’s and the IAA need to step up to the plate, they say.

SPECIALIZATION OR CONSOLIDATION?
The other issue in advertising, aside from a hunger for training, involves whether to specialize --and go off into separate units--, whether to stop being glorified art-shops or ‘boutiques’, or whether to drop the word ‘agency’, and become more of a partner than intermediary. To put things in perspective, last year, the red-hot issue was more rudimentary: the attack on the commission structure, and the need for marketers to have more respect for the creative process. But with the pace of change, ad agencies are themselves looking at what business they are really in. The business of producing ads of course extends beyond translating briefs into artworks. Accountability, consultancy, research projects, media buying and public relations, once the add-ons in the agency are now viable business units. Translated: Clients need to pay for them. This makes sense. In fact, the inherited lack of respect often sprang from agencies becoming the yes-men and dirty-works departments of clients with no strategy. A Poster here, a launch conference there, models handing out samples in supermarkets and a few ads sprinkled in-between was once considered a ‘campaign’. Not anymore. "Superficial selling gimmicks", as O&M Strategic Planner, Andrew Samuel puts it, "don’t have anything to do with brand stewardship". The agency has some big-ticket consultancy assignments that, on the face of it do not look like advertising. As has been discussed in this column before (see "So Image Isn’t Everything", in LMD, January 2000), the identity of the agency will revolve around who gets to be the keepers of the strategy.

Just as in every other industry, in advertising, the world is a circle with an ever-decreasing radius. Wait-time gets shrunk with the penetration of phones, distance crumbles with the availability of E-mail, and the fragmentation of the media in keeping with the consumer segmentation (or is that the other way around?) gives us communicators very little time to catch our breath. The abrasive nature of marketing will generate hot-spots, controversy and miscreants. The unintended consequences of technology and commerce, even E-commerce, will also bring opportunities for new specializations within advertising that may never deal with creating ads at all! So being ‘volatile’ is really a good thing.

With Integrated Marketing Communication, damage control, CRM (customer relationship management), DM and PR taking on added importance, the agency of the future will very different from what we have today --an amalgam of consultancy and strategic planner, think-tank and creative partner rolled into one.


Oh, and they might also create ads!

copyright: angelo fernando